14 comments on “Some Strange Communists I Have Known

  1. I remember a conference of a left party in Britain years ago where a delegate or observer came dressed as Napoleon. The kind of thing that makes the assumption that left-wingers are loonies seem credible. I don’t like control freakery, but coming across as a bunch of psychiatric outpatients is not good either.
    The book was a Cold War classic and the underlying motivations were dubious, but the contribution of the black writer Richard Wright to “The God That Failed” had an interesting episode. He was in some cultural group sympathetic to the CPUSA in the 1930s, and one day a man showed up and came to meetings. One day he denounced another member as a spy and demanded investigations. There was one and he became more and more frantic. Then one day he disappeared. In luggage he left behind there was an address so the other members of the group wrote to it. They received a reply that the man they were asking about had escaped from a psychiatric hospital but had been recaptured.


  2. I think the guy who cited Mao is on to something. Just as you can’t have theory divorced from practice, you can’t have communism divorced from the working class.

    As long as would-be revolutionaries are not rooted in the class they claim to speak for, or rooted in their organizations (unions) and their struggles, however few and far between they may be, the kind of eccentricities that RR describes here are going to be par for the course.

    That especially holds true for groupuscles that are made up mostly of students and which place a premium on the purity of program (as they define it) above all else. The more detached you are from reality, the purer you can be. It would be hard to imagine a group of militant workers, steeled in struggles against the bosses, actually paying attention to, let alone, listening to any of the characters described above. I can’t imagine that in the few countries where Trotskyism did manage to become the dominant tendency within the workers movement, even for a short period of time, that this kind of crap would take place, let alone hold sway.

    Of course, this was not always the case insofar as US Trotskyism was concerned either. Back in the days when the old IWWer (and SPer and CP leader) Jim Cannon was the top Trot in the US, being a Trotskyist may have meant being an “agent of the Mikado” or a “Fifth Columinist” to some, but it didn’t mean being a “wierdo.” That’s because the original Trots were mostly trade unionists and came out of the CP, which, in turn, came out of the SP. Whatever their shortcomings may have been, both were based on the vanguard (most advanced) layers of the working class and intellectuals who had gone over to the working class. Marxism and the class struggle were legitimate schools of thought (in the eyes of militant workers) that even influenced Hollywood movies and popular culture, especially in the 1930s and 1940s. The sixties may have been more far out in terms of sex and drugs and rock and roll (and Mao and Che and Ho Chi Minh) but they didn’t dent the working class the way the 30s and 40s did. Give me John Garfield, Humphrey Bogart and Edward G Robinson any day over their 60s equivalents.

    What changed all that was the post-WWII “cold war” and anti-communist witch-hunt and the prosperity that went with it. Repression and co-optation pretty much destroyed the working class based left in this country in a way that fascism and Nazi occupation wasn’t able to do in countries like France and Italy. With the brief exception of the possibilities presented by the anti-globalization movement, the left here has never recovered from it and as long as it remains based on the same social milleau that it is currently mired in, especially those sectors mired in sixties style identity politics, lesser evilism and single-issuism, it never will.

    P.S. I’m glad I didn’t make your list, although I can figure out who a few of those of who did are!


    • You might make into part two. Left recovery in this country will be impossible without a working class revival, but a working class revival needs a left too. I’m actually pretty optimistic, if only because the last 30 years have been so bad.


  3. I co-lead a support group for people with anxiety and have been meeting all types there. As I read this I was laughing and hoping I was one of the seven and not one of the three…Would that I were colorful or eccentric enough to qualify!


    • As Marxists we know that these categories aren’t fixed and neither are we; most of the time I’m in the seven of ten, but some of the time I cross over to that 30%. It’s probably the same for most of us.


  4. I guess there are quite a handful of weirdos in our Left movement here in Nigeria, tambem. some, despite such shortcomings (not counting in anti-emancipatory dimensions of such as emtdingchung points out) are so genuinely committed to the work of the movement. for some though, you can not but see their commitment as more of a crutch, which could, but for the what got to them first, have been filled by the church or some other secular drift…but yes; the farther away from mass working class politics groups here are, the greater the preponderance of such likes.


    • Baba Aye, it’s heartening to know that we here in the US are not as unique as we think we are. I think what we are talking about here is not unique to the left (though the forms ares), but the dynamic of small, relatively isolated groups of people. It’s easy, as I have done, to poke fun of the left, but my guess is that there are just as many weirdos in chess clubs and even more in local theater troupes. We all have our crutches, in some ways politics isn’t as bad as some others, even if the results are negative.


  5. it is my experience that on the revolutionary left, you generally do find all kinds of lunacies occuring in society, some in a lower, some in a higher per-centage, in case of some comrades, it is fortunate, in other cases unfortunate, that they joined the far left and not a religious or psychoanalytical cult or a pyramid scheme network … but the far bigger problem is, that you have to certain per-centage also people in our organisations, who behave in their private life in a way, which is diametrically opposed to any kind of emancipatory programme (rape, domestic violence)


  6. All revolutionary communists must grasp fully Mao Zedong’s concept of the mass line.

    Or put another way: if people think you’re a fucking weirdo then you’re doing it wrong.


  7. I’m in tears, I know all those comrades! and plenty more, you know who you are! including me! you have to be a little anti-social, if you weren’t you would get along with whats going on and you would truly be demented.


  8. I think you have been doing politics in the extreme margins to amass a litany of such types The marginal extreme sects foster the patronage of the mad and unusual but the getting of wisdom is to occupy a very different political space that does not pander to such traits. A lot of it is desperation of course. That said I think it would be hard to top a character like Tommy Sheridan and pass off the indulgences as ‘normal ‘ left activity.

    Similarly the way left politics — ESP Trotskyism — panders to the elevation of sect mad dies wallowing in charisma — Healey, Posadas, Robinson, Wolthith, Barnes, et al — must be cause for wondering about the culture that pervades the whole current. There was/is a cult over Trotsky and Mandel wasn’t free of such cultivation.

    So I cannot see this phenomenon easily separated from the whole strange communist package. It’s all driven by the marginal existence of course, but there’s a ready option for egos to be pandered to by dint of individuals thinking that what they do changes the world separate from the dynamics of mass movement and history.

    A motor for this mistaken POV is a chronic idealism that pervades far left politics. A view ruled by the purity of Ideas separate from the concrete actuality of living struggles. The problem is that the easy celebration of ideas and ‘program’ elevates that activity to a sort of raison d’être rather the everyday struggle.

    How is all this overcome? I think there is a steep learning curve involved that takes guts to negotiate.


    • “I think you have been doing politics in the extreme margins to amass a litany of such types”


      All revolutionary Marxists in the United States since I’ve been politically active have done politics in the “extreme margins”. We don’t have anything approaching mass working class politics as you well know. Since you don’t know my personal political history it might be best to admit what you don’t know first. On the substance of what you say, I agree with much of it.



Thoughts encouraged:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s